Look for areas that have not yet been thoroughly reviewed or areas for which you think you have a fresh take on old data. Another common mistake is writing an unfocused review that is lost in the details. Use the answers to the questions in Establish the Research Context to develop this section.
What was the objective of the study? I did this by hand on paper; an Excel spreadsheet also would work.
Your contribution as a referee helps keep the scientific process as fair as possible. Evaluate each section of the article — Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion — highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each section.
Absolutely do not review a manuscript if you have a strong feeling positive or negative about any of the authors. Keep in mind that you have every right to ask the authors do a different experiment, or to modify the way they carry out an existing one.
Peer review is at the heart of the scientific process, and in order for the process to work, the review must be rigorous. Third, I make sure that the design of the methods and analyses are appropriate.
Have the authors specified a mechanism by which they will make raw data from their experiments available? Among the scientific community, there has been a growing discussion about the importance of post-peer review—community commenting on aspects of a paper after it has been published—in order to focus assessment of scientific impact to be based more on the quality of the paper itself than the prestige of the journal in which it appeared.
Rather than asking one or two people to help you edit the entire article, break it up into sections and ask a different colleague for his or her expert help in revising just one section on a topic with which you know he or she is familiar.
When diving in deeper, first I try to assess whether all the important papers are cited in the references, as that also often correlates with the quality of the manuscript itself.
Your labmates and collaborators also can help you with the editing process. I found nothing of the sort, so I plowed ahead on my own, inventing techniques for myself. Many journals send the decision letters to the reviewers.
Another strategy is to give part or all of your article to a first-year graduate student or to a scientist in a slightly different field. And secondly, how can it be improved? I tried to reassure myself by remembering that I had been rather good at writing term papers in college; but this was a larger task and one with the potential for having an impact on someone, somewhere, sometime who wanted to learn about caspase substrates.
Source of questions in each section Wood, 4. Experimental replication and discussion of the study by the broader scientific community are also important components of the process.
You can better highlight the major issues that need to be dealt with by restructuring the review, summarizing the important issues upfront, or adding asterisks.
Reviewing manuscripts may not give you obvious immediate benefits, but understand that doing so is a good way of keeping abreast of cutting edge research in your discipline.
Is the sequence of methods clear and pertinent? Is there an angle the authors have overlooked? Biochemia Medica ;19 3:Apr 06, · How do I write a scientific review research paper? I have written a few review papers, and this is my approach.
There are doubtless others that are equally effective, and some of these will be faster, but the approach that I will suggest is one that is thorough and defensible. Sep 08, · Expert Reviewed.
How to Write a Scientific Paper. Five Parts: Formatting the Paper Writing the Sections Making the Figures and Tables Citing Your Sources Properly Sample Paper Community Q&A Even if you are not planning to publish a scientific paper, you may be asked to write in this format for a college course or 71%(53).
How To Write A Good Scientific Literature Review. Last updated Aug 22, Writing a scientific review implies both researching for relevant academic content and writing, however, writing without having a clear objective is a common mistake.
Write notes and summarize the content of each paper as that will help you in the next step. This page features a discussion of each of the following components of writing a scientific review article: Choosing a topic and finding articles; If you need to write a review article but don't know where to start, keep some of these tips in mind.
What is the thesis or problem being addressed in this paper? Guidelines for writing a Review Article A) Good to know about review articles B) Elements of a review article • A scientific text relying on previously published literature or data.
New data from the How long is a review article? Review articles vary considerably in length. Narrative reviews may range between 8, and.
How to Write a Scientific Review Paper - Free download as Word Doc .doc), PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online for free.5/5(24).Download